Skip to main content

Table 2 Accuracy obtained by proposed approach compared to Bianchi et al. ([17]), Galvan et al. ([4]) and Niu et al. ([28]) employing custom tables for first compression

From: Estimating Previous Quantization Factors on Multiple JPEG Compressed Images

PS

QF2=80

QF2=90

 

Proposed

[17]

[4]

[28]

Proposed

[17]

[4]

[28]

5

0.66

0.39

0.53

0.08

0.78

0.64

0.66

0.07

6

0.45

0.11

0.46

0.03

0.82

0.51

0.68

0.08

7

0.62

0.23

0.54

0.08

0.78

0.5

0.64

0.08

8

0.19

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.79

0.26

0.7

0.1

9

0.3

0.19

0

0.09

0.49

0.03

0.49

0.02

10

0.18

0.01

0

0.41

0.43

0.18

0

0.28

11

0.19

0.04

0.04

0.26

0.39

0.05

0.02

0.7

12

0.21

0.05

0.05

0.22

0.38

0.05

0.02

0.75

MEAN

0.35

0.14

0.21

0.15

0.61

0.28

0.4

0.26

  1. The column PS refers to custom tables used by Photoshop. It is worth noting that in PS 11 and 12 matrices, the first 15 DCT coefficients in zig-zag order, are almost no quantized facilitating Niu et al. [28] performances