Skip to main content

Table 5 Robustness evaluation and comparison

From: Fine-grain watermarking for intellectual property protection

Method

Copy and paste

Reformatting

Insertion (%)

Deletion (%)

Replace (%)

Retyping (%)

RPCP(%)

Por et al. [45]

✓

✓

48.3

53.7

55.7

×

0.01

Taleby Ahvanooey et al. [49]

✓

✓

100

99.7

99.6

×

1.9

Rizzo et al. [51]

✓

✓

0

0

1.2

×

0

Taleby Ahvanooey et al. [59]

✓

✓

100

100

100

×

0

Khosravi et al. [47]

×

×

0

1.7

2.6

×

0

Fine-grain TW (proposed)

✓

✓

96.4

98.2

98.3

×

99.92

  1. Robustness evaluation on 1000 news articles of recent, latin-based structural text watermarking and steganography methods. The results of the attacks involving insertion, deletion, and replacement of words are shown for 10% attack size, while 32 words are considered for partial copy RPCP