Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage of mates retrieved within rank k for various databases from the corresponding reference database

From: Identification performance of evidential value estimation for ridge-based biometrics

 

\(\boldsymbol {T}_{\text {VP}}^{\ast }\)

TIIIT−DC

\(\boldsymbol {T}_{\mathrm {IIIT-D}}^{T}\)

T BP

Rank 1

44.05 %(@0 %)

52.74 %(@0 %)

43.61 %(@0 %)

13.52 %(@0 %)

Rank 5

62.55 %(@0 %)

55.61 %(@0 %)

47.98 %(@0 %)

21.11 %(@0 %)

Rank 10

74.57 %(@0 %)

57.96 %(@0 %)

50.47 %(@0 %)

29.30 %(@0 %)

Rank 20

87.66 %(@0 %)

60.31 %(@0 %)

52.65 %(@0 %)

41.19 %(@0 %)

Rank 1

71.00 %(@50 %)

62.35 %(@33 %)

64.17 %(@50 %)

17.27 %(@49 %)

Rank 5

82.90 %(@50 %)

65.52 %(@47 %)

66.87 %(@50 %)

23.29 %(@49 %)

Rank 10

89.46 %(@50 %)

66.67 %(@38 %)

68.42 %(@50 %)

29.72 %(@49 %)

Rank 20

94.19 %(@50 %)

68.97 %(@47 %)

69.66 %(@50 %)

42.50 %(@43 %)

  1. The upper half of the table indicates the results without the removal of low-quality specimens; the lower half states the highest retrieval rate when up to 50% of the images are removed based on their quality estimated by EVA