Skip to main content

Table 1 AUC values achieved on the Dresden Image Database by the proposed algorithm and the algorithms presented in [11] and [12]

From: Double JPEG compression forensics based on a convolutional neural network

QF2

 

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

QF1

60

Proposed

0.68

0.88

0.95

0.96

0.99

0.99

1.00

0.99

Bayesian approach

0.50

0.83

0.97

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

0.99

SVM

0.50

0.81

0.90

0.75

0.74

0.74

0.94

0.96

70

Proposed

0.95

0.86

0.67

0.85

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

Bayesian approach

0.85

0.70

0.48

0.83

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.99

SVM

0.72

0.71

0.68

0.70

0.75

0.75

0.97

0.98

80

Proposed

0.98

0.94

0.99

0.94

0.44

0.99

1.00

0.99

Bayesian approach

0.90

0.88

0.93

0.85

0.44

1.00

1.00

0.99

SVM

0.50

0.71

0.88

0.81

0.40

0.87

0.85

0.97

90

Proposed

0.89

0.78

0.91

0.81

0.97

0.97

0.45

1.00

Bayesian approach

0.68

0.65

0.67

0.72

0.82

0.92

0.50

1.00

SVM

0.54

0.65

0.71

0.64

0.71

0.72

0.65

0.99

95

Proposed

0.71

0.66

0.63

0.57

0.51

0.67

0.93

0.46

Bayesian approach

0.50

0.53

0.57

0.55

0.48

0.76

0.93

0.50

SVM

0.49

0.57

0.62

0.45

0.51

0.57

0.64

0.44