Skip to main content

Table 7 phishGILLNET2--binary (phish versus not phish) classification performance

From: phishGILLNET—phishing detection methodology using probabilistic latent semantic analysis, AdaBoost, and co-training

Topics

Weak learner for boosting

TPR

FPR

Precision

Recall

F-measure

ROC Area

Time (s)

50

C4.5

0.985

0.055

0.985

0.985

0.985

0.966

0.79

50

RIPPER

0.989

0.051

0.989

0.989

0.989

0.968

4.17

50

Random forest

0.993

0.053

0.993

0.993

0.993

0.999

1.31

50

SVM

0.939

0.355

0.935

0.939

0.937

0.792

12.67

50

Logistic

0.938

0.421

0.932

0.938

0.933

0.957

1.0

100

C4.5

0.995

0.02

0.995

0.995

0.995

0.987

1.58

100

RIPPER

0.997

0.012

0.997

0.997

0.997

0.993

6.82

100

Random forest

0.994

0.052

0.994

0.994

0.994

0.999

2.32

100

SVM

0.992

0.069

0.992

0.992

0.992

0.961

10.55

100

Logistic

0.995

0.023

0.995

0.995

0.995

0.994

2.17

200

C4.5

0.996

0.019

0.996

0.996

0.996

0.991

2.51

200

RIPPER

0.994

0.024

0.994

0.994

0.994

0.987

7.85

200

Random forest

0.995

0.037

0.995

0.995

0.995

0.999

2.87

200

SVM

0.988

0.098

0.988

0.988

0.988

0.945

10.78

200

Logistic

0.997

0.018

0.997

0.997

0.997

0.997

4.11