Table 11 Performance comparison--binary classification
Method | F-measure (%) | Rank |
|---|---|---|
phishGILLNET3 | 100.00 | 1 |
Bergholz et al. [17] | 99.89 | 2 |
phishGILLNET2 | 99.70 | 3 |
Bergholz et al. [16] | 99.46 | 4 |
Khonji et al. [20] | 99.396 | 5 |
Toolan and Carthy [19] | 99.31 | 6 |
phishGILLNET1 | 98.10 | 7 |
PILFER [10] | 97.64 | 8 |
SVM with feature selection (Table 5) | 95.90 | 9 |
Abu-Nimeh et al. [11] | 90.24 | 10 |
Abu-Nimeh et al. [12] | NA | - |
Gansterer and Pölz [15] | NA | - |
Al-Momani et al. [21] | NA | - |