Skip to main content

Table 1 Phishing detection tools

From: phishGILLNET—phishing detection methodology using probabilistic latent semantic analysis, AdaBoost, and co-training

Tool

Type

Description

Advantages

Disadvantages

Snort [4]

Network Level

Heuristic/rule engine

Good at detecting level attacks

Rules require manual adjustments. Does not look at content.

SpamAssassin [9]

Server Side Filter

Heuristic engine that uses email specific features

Good at detecting email header spoofing.

High false positives

PILFER [10]

Server Side Filter

Utilize 10 features extracted from email to classify

Better performance than SpamAssasin.

Did not use content from body of the email.

Susceptible to short lived phish domains.

SpoofGuard [30]

Client Side Tool

Plug-in to a browser

Warns user if link points to phish site.

Users do not pay attention to warnings. Not all email clients are browser based.

CatchingPhish [31]

Client Side Tool

Detects fake website based on rendered images

Browser independent.

Good results on small data sets.

Processing time is high. Susceptible to screen resolution.

CallingID [32], CloudMark [33], Netcraft [34], and FirePhish [35]

Client Side Tool

Utilizes blacklist of domains.

Good for domains that employ domain level authentication.

Phish domains are short lived. Does not look at email content.

eBay Account Guard[36]

Client Side Tool

Utilizes blacklist of eBay URLs

Protects eBay users.

Specific website tool.

IE Phishing Filter[37]

Client Side Tool

Records specific user website visiting patterns.

Adapts to user website visit pattern.

Works only on internet explorer.