Skip to main content

Table 7 Summarized experimental results of key approaches to BCSs.

From: A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics

Author(s) Applied scheme Char. FRR/FAR (%) Data Set Key Length Remarks
Hao et al. [32]    0.42/0.0 70 subjects 140-bit -
  Fuzzy commitment Iris     
Bringer et al. [33]    5.62/0.0 ICE 2005 (244 subjects) 40-bit -
       pre-alignment,
Clancy et al. [55]    20-30/0.0 not given 224-bit >1 enroll sam.
   Fingerprints     
Nandakumar et al. [56] Fuzzy vault   4.0/0.004 FVC2002-DB2 (110 subjects) 128-bit >1 enroll sam.
   Iris 5.5/0.0 CASIA v1 (108 subjects) 256-bit -
Wu et al. [68, 70]       
   Palmprint 0.73/0.0 PolyU DB (386 subjects) 292-bit -
Feng and Wah [21]    28.0/1.2 750 subjects 40-bit  
  Quantization Online signature     >1 enroll sam.
Vielhauer et al. [22]    7.05/0.0 10 subjects 24-bit  
Monrose et al. [23] Password-hardening Voice > 2.0/2.0 90 subjects ~ 60-bit -
Teoh et al. [92] BioHashing Face 0.0/0.0 ORL-DB/Faces94 (194 subjects) 80-bit Non-stolen token
  Multibiometric Fingerprint   MSU-DBI and   
Nandakumar et al. [106]    1.8/0.01   224 bits -
  Fuzzy Vault and Iris   CASIA v1 (108 subjects)