Robust JPEG steganography based on the robustness classifier

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

Table 11 Robustness performance of proposed methods and GMAS with the quality factor as 90

Algorithm	Payload	Protocol messages\(avg(P_{e})\)\(\times 10^{-2}\)	Protocol messages\(var(P_{e})\)\(\times 10^{-4}\)	Secret messages\(avg(P_{e})\)\(\times 10^{-2}\)	Secret messages\(var(P_{e})\)\(\times 10^{-4}\)	Success rate (%)
GMAS	0.05	-	-	8.20	92.00	44.10
	0.1	-	-	4.92	42.00	51.50
	0.2	-	-	2.85	17.00	60.70
	0.3	-	-	2.12	10.00	63.70
methodI	0.05	0.44	1.53	0.94	0.25	98.10
	0.1	0.44	1.53	0.51	0.08	98.30
	0.2	0.44	1.54	0.31	0.10	98.10
	0.3	0.44	1.54	0.32	0.25	97.60
methodII0	0.05	0.69	1.60	0.94	0.25	99.00
	0.1	0.70	1.61	0.51	0.08	99.20
	0.2	0.69	1.61	0.31	0.09	99.00
	0.3	0.69	1.60	0.32	0.25	98.60
methodII	0.05	0.30	0.30	0.95	0.26	99.70
	0.1	0.30	0.29	0.52	0.08	99.90
	0.2	0.30	0.30	0.32	0.11	99.70
	0.3	0.30	0.30	0.33	0.26	99.20
methodIII	0.05	0.44	0.73	0.95	0.26	99.60
	0.1	0.44	0.74	0.52	0.08	99.80
	0.2	0.44	0.74	0.32	0.10	99.60
	0.3	0.44	0.74	0.32	0.20	99.10

Note: Boldface highlights the best performance in a column with the same payload