Table 10 Robustness performance of proposed methods and GMAS with the quality factor as 85
From: Robust JPEG steganography based on the robustness classifier
Algorithm | Payload | Protocol messages\(avg(P_{e}) \times 10^{-2}\) | Protocol messages\(var(P_{e}) \times 10^{-4}\) | Secret messages\(avg(P_{e}) \times 10^{-2}\) | Secret messages\(var(P_{e}) \times 10^{-4}\) | Success rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAS | 0.05 | - | - | 11.75 | 138.00 | 31.10 |
0.1 | - | - | 7.35 | 73.00 | 38.20 | |
0.2 | - | - | 4.28 | 32.00 | 47.30 | |
0.3 | - | - | 3.22 | 20.00 | 53.50 | |
methodI | 0.05 | 0.81 | 3.16 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 98.20 |
0.1 | 0.81 | 3.16 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 98.30 | |
0.2 | 0.81 | 3.16 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 98.20 | |
0.3 | 0.81 | 3.13 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 97.90 | |
methodII0 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 2.66 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 98.70 |
0.1 | 0.99 | 2.67 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 98.70 | |
0.2 | 0.99 | 2.66 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 98.60 | |
0.3 | 0.99 | 2.65 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 98.30 | |
methodII | 0.05 | 0.72 | 1.19 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 99.60 |
0.1 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 99.60 | |
0.2 | 0.71 | 1.18 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 99.60 | |
0.3 | 0.71 | 1.18 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 98.90 | |
methodIII | 0.05 | 0.79 | 1.51 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 99.40 |
0.1 | 0.79 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 99.40 | |
0.2 | 0.79 | 1.51 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 99.30 | |
0.3 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 98.60 |